跳到主要內容

可以創新的四個面向

Every organization needs to innovate. But what type of innovation to give priority to? This simple matrix with four types of innovation may help.
Innovation basically means introducing something new (‘nova’). This “something new” can be anything and that’s where the problem starts. In two ways.

- First, by an overemphasis on product (or service) innovation, thereby not giving enough attention to other types
- Second, by getting overwhelmed by all the innovation opportunities that are out there.

To solve both problems at the same time, it helps to gain some clarity on what types of innovation there are. To that end, I’ve created this simple 2x2 matrix containing what I think are the four most important types of innovation for every organization.

Let me first explain the two axes. The first is the inward-outward axis. Outward-oriented innovations are those innovations that are mostly targeted at the market, at doing something new for customers. Inward-oriented innovations, on the other hand, are innovating the organization itself.

On the second axis, Operational innovations are typically quite technical and tangible, and focused on the practical work and output. Strategic innovations, on the other hand, regard how the organization is functioning overall and how it creates value.

This leads to the following four types of innovation:

1. Product Innovation. The most well-known type of innovation in which you change, improve or renew an organization’s products and/or services, or create new ones.

2. Process Innovation. Often efficiency and quality-driven to improve the way the organization works on a day-to-day basis. This can concern any type of process.

3. Business Model Innovation. A newer type, focused on changing how the organization creates and captures value. Often focused on developing new revenue models.

4. Management Innovation. Less commonly known but critical, this type concerns innovating how an organization is organized, managed, and led. Often implies decentralization.

All four types are important and with this matrix you can start managing your innovation portfolio. Ask yourself questions like: Do I have sufficient initiatives in all quadrants? And, which type of innovation should get priority now?

#innovationmanagement
#processimprovement
#productdesign
#businessmodel

Author: Jeroen Kraaijenbrink
Reference: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7079837031131930626?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

用 C# 批次控制 Word 合併列印

前由 我有全區的電話資料,問題在於我要依不同里別來製作出電話簿。結果如下圖: 單純採用合併列印無法達成我的需求。解決方法係用「功能變數」儲存上一個里別,與現在里別進行比較:若不同,則換頁。不過,這樣功能變數還蠻長的。最後,我還是採用 C# 來解決。 解決方案 用 C# 控制 WORD 中合併列印的「資料來源 Data Source」,給予不同里別的「sqlstatement」。迴圈處理不同的里別即可。但可預見其處理過程會很慢,不過還好,我可以不用在意它,有跑出結果即可。 程式碼 IList<string> areas = new List<string>() { "後壁", "侯伯", "嘉苳", "土溝", "嘉田", "嘉民", "菁豊", "崁頂", "後廍", "墨林", "菁寮", "新嘉", "頂長", "平安", "仕安", "竹新", "新東", "長安", "頂安", "福安", "烏樹" }; string root = @"D:\"; // 根目錄 string data = root + @"\data.docm"; // 資料檔(即資料來源) string template = root + @"\template.docx"; // 已設定好格式與合併欄位的 Word 檔 string output = @"d:\Final"; // 輸出之資料夾 object oMissing = System.Reflection.Missing.Va...

VLC c# 順利編譯

原文網址: http://www.cnblogs.com/haibindev/archive/2011/12/21/2296173.html 原文作者: haibindev 原文標題:c#万能视频播放器 本文的重點在於修正 class VlcPlayer,使其能順利在 VC# Express 2010 .Net Framework 4 下順利編譯。 修正重點在於 CallingConvention = CallingConvention. StdCall 改成 CallingConvention = CallingConvention. Cdecl using System; using System.Runtime.InteropServices; using System.Security; using System.Text; namespace VlcDotNet { class VlcPlayer { private IntPtr libvlc_instance_; private IntPtr libvlc_media_player_; private double duration_; public VlcPlayer(string pluginPath) { string plugin_arg = "--plugin-path=" + pluginPath; string[] arguments = { "-I", "dummy", "--ignore-config", "--no-video-title", plugin_arg }; libvlc_instance_ = LibVlcAPI.libvlc_new(arguments); libvlc_media_player_ = LibVlcAPI.libvlc_media_player_new(libvlc_instance_); } public ...

[Symfony+Doctrine] 透過非 Id 來使用 Pessimistic Lock

根據 文件 ,Doctrine 有 Pessimistic Lock,又分為兩種: LockMode::PESSIMISTIC_WRITE:對應至 MySQL 的 Select FOR UPDATE LockMode::PESSIMISTIC_READ:對應至 MySQL 的 Select LOCK IN SHARE MODE 差別在於 LOCK IN SHARE MODE 會將在 row 的資料鎖定(row-level lock),在非同一交易(Transaction)下,不給寫入,其他交易可以讀取, 且可以繼續 Select LOCK IN SHARE MODE 。而 FOR UPDATE 不僅鎖定該資料,在非同一交易下,不給寫入,其它交易可以讀取, 但不能 Select LOCK IN SHARE MODE 。MySQL 文件有更詳細的比較與情境使用的說明,參考 網址 。 現在問題是,我們要完全採用 ORM 來處理資料。Doctrine 的文件提到 EntityManager::find 可以採用 Pessimistic Lock, 但 find 是透過 id 來處理 。而其他 find 系列函數(包括:findAll, findBy, findOneBy)皆不支援 LockMode。 因此,勢必要有方法來「透過非 id 來使用 Pessimistic Lock」。透過查看原始碼,簡單的方法是有的,解法之範例如下: 19 public function depositAction() 20 { 21 22 $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager(); 23 24 $em->transactional(function ($em) { 25 $entityName = 'AcmeTrainingBundle:Account'; 26 $lockMode = LockMode::PESSIMISTIC_READ; 27 $orderBy = null; 28 $...